1. Disciplinary Lenses
"Disciplines are not collections of certified facts;
rather, they are lenses through which we look at the world and interpret
it......they orient our attention to specific questions about the world...and
provide us with standards for what counts as viable answers to such
questions." (Boix Mansilla, Gardner and Miller, On Disciplinary Lenses
and Interdisciplinary Work).
What is one specific way that your content research
(math, science, history, non-fiction, literature, writing, art, modern
languages, physical education) thus far has caused you to re-think about an
idea, or question, or caused you to challenge assumptions that you had
previously not considered-or-even pushed you further in your thinking? Discuss.
My
content research thus far has caused me to re-think, question, and challenge
assumptions about autism. In particular, the three primary sources I have found
thus far (Twirling naked in the streets and no
one noticed: growing up with undiagnosed autism by Jeannie
Davide-Rivera, Look me in the eye my
life with Asperger’s by John Elder
Robison, and Temple Grandin’s TEDtalk The world needs all kinds of minds) have
really changed the way I think about autism. All of these primary sources gave
me great insight into autism from the point of view of someone on the autism
spectrum. In particular, I found it really interesting to read both
Davide-Rivera and Robison’s memoirs, as both of these remarkable individuals
lived with undiagnosed autism until late adulthood. I think that often as
educators, and other professionals who work with autistic individuals, we see
autism as a special need or a disability and not for the strengths and
remarkable gifts that those on the spectrum possess. This idea is additionally
reiterated through Temple Grandin’s talk where she explains the way her mind
works, “thinking in pictures”, and how it allows her to solve problems that
many people not on the spectrum do not notice. Gradin also asserts that the
world needs people on the autism spectrum as they possess different ways of
thinking that make them extremely gifted and often specialized for important
tasks and jobs.
My research
has also made me realize an unfortunate truth, which is that many educators,
such as myself, do not know enough about the autism spectrum to feel confident
in the way in which they accommodate students on the spectrum in their
classroom. The research shows that many teachers express a concern about their
self-efficacy and motivation to teach students on the autism spectrum.
Additional findings show that many teachers in the general education classroom
do not believe it is their job to educate these students on the autism
spectrum. I have a heavy heart as I read these studies that express these
negative, pessimistic attitudes that many teachers have toward the autistic
students assigned to their classes. I additionally feel that many of these
feelings could be changed if teacher preparation programs, as one research
article I found suggests, expressed teaching and accommodating the strengths
and needs of autistic students in an inclusive education environment as a very
accomplishable and rewarding endeavor.
2. The Death and Life of the Great American School
System, Diane Ravitch
·
How do you think the Common Core
standards might fit in this narrative of school reform
The
Common Core standards are aimed to give students skills and thinking processes
that prepare them for the real world. The skills emphasized in the new Common
Core standards are meant to be practical and applicable skills that have a use
beyond the classroom. I think that the Common Core standards are a step in the
right direction to a reform that focuses more on practical skills and less on
the straight memorization and regurgitation of facts.
I
think that in the long run, Common Core standards will be just another plot
point in the narrative of school reform. Inevitably, these standards will be
readjusted, reworded, or replaced as they will not be the magic fix to raise
test scores or close the achievement gap just as none of the previous reforms have
been able to either. I believe that while Common Core standards sound like a
positive change from the standards we have become accustomed to in California,
the pendulum will swing back from the process-focused Common Core back to the
rigid must-know skills that the current standards focus on. I think that until
reform focuses on the bigger picture and bigger issues, changes such as the
implementation of Common Core standards will continue to be fads that we see
come in and fade out.
·
In
Chapter 9, Ravitch says critics argue schools would improve if unions ceased to
exist.
"Let's
start with the hardest question: should teachers' unions exist? Do the
protections they offer their members depress student achievement? Are they an
"adult interest group," as their critics charge, whose priorities
conflict with the needs of their students? Would schools improve if there were
no unions to represent the teachers?" (Ravitch 173)
- What argument does she present
based on available research? What do you think?
Ravitch presents a
range of perspectives on teachers unions based on available research. Ravitch
discusses how teachers unions came about, and explains that one reason that
teachers began to join unions was “to protect their right to think, speak, and
teach without fear,” (174). She
discusses how teachers have historically been underpaid and many teachers
joined unions to seek higher pay and better working conditions.
A solid point made by
Ravitch on page 175 states, “one would think, by reading the critics, that the
nation’s schools are overrun by incompetent teachers who hold their jobs only
because of union protections, that unions are directly responsible for poor
student performance, and that academic achievement would soar if the unions
were to disappear. This is unfair. No one, to my knowledge has demonstrated
clear, indisputable correlation between teacher unionism and academic
achievement, either negative or positive.”
The chapter continues
on with Ravitch making solid points from the perspective of union critics, with
a discussion of how tenure works and how unions makes it more difficult to dismiss
some incompetent teachers from their job. I agree with her statement that
because unions are not going to disappear, “district officials should
collaborate with them to develop a fair and expeditious process for removing
incompetent teachers rather than using the union as a scapegoat for low
performance or for the conditions in the school and society that are beyond the
teachers’ control,” (176).
Overall, it is hard
to formulate my own opinions on teachers unions, as I am only a recent
credential graduate and am yet to complete my first year teaching. I believe
that a great deal of my opinion on unions will be formulated with experience.
However, from reading this chapter as well as doing my own research on the
topic, I see where both sides are coming from on the issues. I think it is
unfair for teachers to have to fear their job due to things beyond their
control such as low test scores due to circumstance (demographic factors,
school conditions, etc.). At the same time, I do not think it is right for
incompetent or ineffective teachers to continue to teach year after year if
they are not benefiting their students. I understand that in the teaching
profession, as it stands today, many teachers feel that in order to protect
themselves and their job they need to be a part of a union. In fact, many
school districts require their teachers to join a union. However, I think that
these unions and the school districts need to find a common ground and work
together in order to do what is best for the greater goal—student learning.
I found a great deal
of information and opinions about teachers unions online. I have included the
links to some interesting nformation I found for anyone who is interested in checking them out.
Blogs I have responded to:
1. April Klassen
2. Taylor Franceschi